• Hive,  Tez

    Apache Hive – Monitoring Progress of Long-Running Reducers – hive.log.every.n.records Option

    Reducer aggregates rows within input groups (i.e. rows having the same grouping key) typically producing one output row per group. For example, the following query returns ~200 rows even if the source events table has billions of rows:

    SELECT country, count(*) 
    FROM events 
    GROUP BY country;
    

    The problem is that despite the small number of output rows the aggregation still can be a very long process taking many hours.

  • Hive,  Pig,  Tez

    Apache Hive/Pig on Tez – Long Running Tasks and Their Failed Attempts – Analyzing Performance and Finding Bottlenecks (Insufficient Parallelism) using Application Master Logs

    Apache Tez is the main distributed execution engine for Apache Hive and Apache Pig jobs.

    Tez represents a data flow as DAGs (Directed acyclic graph) that consists of a set of vertices connected by edges. Vertices represent data transformations while edges represent movement of data between vertices.

    For example, the following Hive SQL query:

    SELECT u.name, sum_items 
    FROM
     (
       SELECT user_id, SUM(items) sum_items
       FROM sales
       GROUP BY user_id
     ) s
     JOIN
       users u
     ON s.user_id = u.id
    

    and its corresponding Apache Pig script:

    sales = LOAD 'sales' USING org.apache.hive.hcatalog.pig.HCatLoader();
    users = LOAD 'users' USING org.apache.hive.hcatalog.pig.HCatLoader();
    
    sales_agg = FOREACH (GROUP sales BY user_id)
      GENERATE 
        group.user_id as user_id,
        SUM(sales.items) as sum_items;
        
    data = JOIN sales_agg BY user_id, users BY id;
    

    Can be represented as the following DAG in Tez:

    In my case the job ran almost 5 hours:

    Why did it take so long to run the job? Is there any way to improve its performance?

  • Amazon,  AWS,  RDS

    Sqoop Import from Amazon RDS Read Replica – ERROR: Canceling Statement due to Conflict with Recovery

    Apache Sqoop is widely used to import data from relational databases into cloud. One of our databases uses Amazon RDS for PostgreSQL to store sales data and its Sqoop import periodically failed with the following error:

    Error: java.io.IOException: SQLException in nextKeyValue
    Caused by: org.postgresql.util.PSQLException: ERROR: canceling statement due to conflict with recovery
      Detail: User query might have needed to see row versions that must be removed.
    

    In this article I will describe a solution that helped resolve the problem in our specific case.

  • Hadoop,  YARN

    Hadoop YARN – Calculating Per Second Utilization of Cluster using Resource Manager Logs

    You can use YARN REST API to collect various Hadoop cluster metrics such as available and allocated memory, CPU, containers and so on.

    If you set up a process to extract data from this API once per minute e.g. you can very easily collect and analyze historical and current cluster utilization quite accurately. For more details, see Collecting Utilization Metrics from Multiple Clusters article.

    But even if you query YARN REST API every second it still can only provide a snapshot of the used YARN resources. It does not show which application allocates or releases containers, their memory and CPU capacity, in which order these events occur, what is their exact timestamp and so on.

    For this reason I prefer a different approach that is based on using the YARN Resource Manager logs to calculate the exact per second utilization metrics of a Hadoop cluster.

  • Hadoop,  Hive,  Memory,  YARN

    Tuning Hadoop YARN – Boosting Memory Settings Beyond the Limits to Increase Cluster Capacity and Utilization

    Memory allocation in Hadoop YARN clusters has some drawbacks that may lead to significant cluster under-utilization and at the same time (!) to large queues of pending applications.

    So you have to pay for extra compute resources that you do not use and still have unsatisfied users. Let’s see how this can happen and how you can mitigate this.

  • AWS,  EMR,  Hadoop,  YARN

    Amazon EMR – Recovering Ghost Nodes

    In a Hadoop cluster besides Active nodes you may also have Unhealthy, Lost and Decommissioned nodes. Unhealthy nodes are running but just excluded from scheduling the tasks because they, for example, do not have enough disk space. Lost nodes are nodes that are not reachable anymore. The decommissioned nodes are nodes that successfully terminated and left the cluster.

    But all these nodes are known to the Hadoop YARN cluster and you can see their details such as IP addresses, last health updates and so on.

    At the same time there can be also Ghost nodes i.e. nodes that are running by Amazon EMR services but Hadoop itself does not know anything about their existence. Let’s see how you can find them.

  • AWS,  EMR,  Hadoop,  YARN

    Hadoop YARN – Collecting Utilization Metrics from Multiple Clusters

    When you run many Hadoop clusters it is useful to automatically collect metrics from all clusters in a single place (Hive table i.e.).

    This allows you to perform any advanced and custom analysis of your clusters workload and not be limited to the features provided by Hadoop Administration UI tools that often offer only per cluster view so it is hard to see the whole picture of your data platform.